Will an impacted crop clear itself? how long can a chicken live with an impacted crop.
Contents
Generally, no. For most games, an i5 is more than enough to run anything the game can throw at it. The bottleneck will usually be the GPU. This is true even with a 1080 GTX.
Retired Moderator. Will a i5-9600k bottleneck a GTX 1080? No it won’t it’s a good pairing. 9600k can handle the 1080 easily.
It is best to match comparable spec parts, a 1080TI is waaaayyyy overkill, and yes eventually the i5 will ‘cap‘ because it has less Hyperthreads to process Data as compared to a i7 (8 ‘Cores’ as compared to ‘4’ cores or lanes of traffic for the processor to process).
I’d say 10400’s 6c/12t, not far off from the 7700k, will be fine for most things gaming with the 1080Ti at 1080p if it was still able to serve a faster card.
Generally, no. For most games, an i5 is more than enough to run anything the game can throw at it. The bottleneck will usually be the GPU. This is true even with a 1080 GTX.
Similarly, the Intel Core i5-8600K and i5-9600K are mid-range chips that will handle the demands of streaming – both have six cores.
It should work just fine due to it’s 6 cores 12 intense cores. You should be able to stream Triple A games at at least 60 frames depending on the rest of your build. It doesn’t bottleneck easy with a 4.9 GhZ turbo.
The Core i5-7600K provides a decent gaming experience during normal streaming, churning out 79.2 FPS. That’s because it really isn’t encoding frames, though—it drops 84.9% of them. The stream is unwatchable by any measurement.
Generally speaking, Intel’s 7th Generation Kaby and Coffee Lake processors are faster than AMD’s Ryzen processors but there are exceptions. In general usage Intel wins but if and when an application or game that takes full advantage of all the available cores is used, Ryzen can be significantly faster.
At their debut, the Ryzen 5000 series were the highest-performing chips on the market and beat Intel in every metric that matters, including gaming, application performance, power consumption, and thermals. Intel now has the edge with the Alder Lake chips.
The majority of modern games recommend at least 8GB, so 16GB of RAM is the ideal amount for gaming and streaming setups. It is enough to play and stream most games at 720p and 1080p without sacrificing video and sound quality.
For a PC that can play games and stream without breaking the bank, the only processor really worth considering is the AMD Ryzen 5 3600. This six-core CPU is a fantastic gaming chip that will pump out high frame rates in Esports and even AAA games if you pair it with the right graphics card.
It’s also good for streaming games if you have an Nvidia graphics card and use NVENC to encode your video (AMD graphics cards don’t have very good encoders, and CPU encoding would significantly reduce average fps and fps stability in most games).
So, if you just want to game at 1080p, or game and stream with the GPU encoder, the 10400F might, maybe, be a better option. If you want to game and stream with the x264 encoder, and especially if you want to edit and render your clips too, the 3600 or 3600X is a better option.
The Core i5 12600K is the standout processor for gamers because it not only offers great gaming performance across the board, but it does so at a price point that isn’t going to reduce you to tears.
AMD Ryzen 5 processors are generally slightly less powerful than i5 processors. They have a clock speed of up to 4.4GHz, compared to the 4.6GHz of the i5. But they do have twice as many threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 also stands out thanks to a very low power consumption of 65W.
Our Verdict. Intel’s mid-range Comet Lake chips swing the game back in its favour. With serious gaming performance, overclocking chops, and finally some multi-threaded juice, the Core i5 10600K is a great CPU.